Originally posted by pnw1n@Jul 29 2005, 10:23 AM
i wouldnt be doing the lt1 i would be doing the one with 250K miles that is a normal ss. all the pics i took up top are of my dads impala. mine isnt as nice but still rocks..
now im debating on getting a jumper and just doing all the other stuff to this car or just totally doing this car... and by the way badcad neons rock
.
[snapback]3504276[/snapback]
Dude, if it's an SS, then it's an LT1. 1994-1996 Impala SS came with an LT1. The other car that keeps coming up has caused a lot of confusion, but I'm not addressing the 5K mile car. You have an SS, which has an LT1. Big Poppa said there were "all those performance parts" in an SS, which is true - an LT1 and a stiffer suspension. BUT, if you're going to juice or bag it, then you're removing the stock suspension. Furthermore, my point was your SS has 250,000 miles on the LT1 - not exactly "desirable" when coming to resale value. Additionally, adding neons (however cool, I know a LOT of people will debate you on that) and changing the stereo and anything else for that matter that is NOT A DESIRABLE modification when it comes to resale value will, of course, continue to depreciate the value of your SS.
Your car isn't worth a ton already, so I wouldn't worry about cutting it. Even if it was the 5K mile car, who gives a fuck? It's your damn car, do what you want.
So, fuck it, the point is do what you want, I have lost interest.