a cutlass is not a mucsle car, a 442 is dickweed. Also what do you think a impala ss was back in the day? :angry:Originally posted by gothabillie@Jul 26 2005, 08:02 PM
what a fucking waste to do to a muscle car ............
actually impalas and belairs are definately muscle cars...what do you think GM ran for their superstock drag cars in the early sixties? get your shit straight before you pop off at the mouth, and dont even try to start an argument on this topic with me because i can gaurentee you will have your ass handed to youOriginally posted by gothabillie@Jul 27 2005, 06:23 AM
umm any 64-72 GM intermedit is a fucking muscle car a impala is a heavy fullsize car not a lightweight good handleing weight to ratio car dickweed & punk having owned more muscle cars I can count nothing will change my option i fucking hate muscle cars with juice but hell i hate 62-64 impalas its a matter of option dont get your panites in a bunch
Originally posted by Loco Low Tucson 520@Jul 27 2005, 11:53 AM
you dumb ass fuck a impala was a muscle car thats why the 63 and 63 had 454 i hate when people act like they know everything on here
Originally posted by gothabillie@Jul 27 2005, 06:37 PM
also reason i am not trying to start a fight bout this figgered you waz a dragger also & i like high horse IMPs & fullsizes just used to build prostreet 60s maros & birds as there lightest cars that i liked older brother had a 300HP 327 4 speed IMP vert SS in like 1980 & from what i remember it was scary fast